#1 May 17th, 2005 06:02 AM

Belgareth
Member

Puzzling statistic

I have just been wandering through the current top 10, as voted for by the illustrious members of ISM, and I have noticed a trend which seems to buck the numerous statements, made in this forum, about the positive attributes (nay adoration even) of feminine body hair. Has anyone realised that, almost without exception, all of the contributors who have been voted into the current top 10 are displaying no body hair and, of those who are, there is very little of it.

Me thinks that, either the illustrious members are telling porkies, or they are just not voting.


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#2 May 17th, 2005 06:11 AM

wantingscott
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

well, if you look at the current stats, there are 17,061 ISM members currently... the "lovely hairy women" thread got 66 replies, many by the same people, though it has over 12,000 views...

i think "shaving cream" has become ISM's "bread and butter..."

wscvott


_________________________________________________
that's the way it goes. but don't forget, it goes the other way too.

Offline

#3 May 17th, 2005 06:25 AM

Gimme_Danger
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

I confessed in these fora that I personally like it all smooth and edible....and there have been some nice ones lately

Offline

#4 May 17th, 2005 07:14 AM

Belgareth
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

wantingscott wrote:

well, if you look at the current stats, there are 17,061 ISM members currently... the "lovely hairy women" thread got 66 replies, many by the same people, though it has over 12,000 views...

i think "shaving cream" has become ISM's "bread and butter..."

wscvott

Trust you to throw another statistic at me! I don't know about shaving cream though. The flawless finish which some of those ladies have obtained I have never managed to achieve with a blade. Me thinks that the assistance of a waxlike substance may have been employed ;-)


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#5 May 17th, 2005 07:21 AM

Belgareth
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Gimme_Danger wrote:

I confessed in these fora that I personally like it all smooth and edible....and there have been some nice ones lately

It is indeed a pleasant sight to behold when performed correctly.

BTW it's good to see someone who appreciates a Latin plural. I seem to have developed a hatred of the bastardisation of Latin words and the expression which really gets to me is references to this data instead of these data.


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#6 May 17th, 2005 08:25 AM

zimbonies
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Belgareth wrote:

I have just been wandering through the current top 10, as voted for by the illustrious members of ISM, and I have noticed a trend which seems to buck the numerous statements, made in this forum, about the positive attributes (nay adoration even) of feminine body hair. Has anyone realised that, almost without exception, all of the contributors who have been voted into the current top 10 are displaying no body hair and, of those who are, there is very little of it.

Me thinks that, either the illustrious members are telling porkies, or they are just not voting.

I have voted because of beautiful bodies, regardless of hair or the lack thereof.  I love a woman with small breasts and a tight belly.  Hipbones are my downfall, so that's where my vote goes to -- it just so happens that the ones that get my vote are the shaved (or trimmed) ones...


"Look at da Chort?!  He's gone mad wit power!"

Offline

#7 May 17th, 2005 08:28 AM

zimbonies
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

wantingscott wrote:

well, if you look at the current stats, there are 17,061 ISM members currently...

I've often wondered how many members there are to this illustrious site.  Now I know -- however, I'm curious as to how you found this information?  Does this include past, present and current members?
Interesting statistic...


"Look at da Chort?!  He's gone mad wit power!"

Offline

#8 May 17th, 2005 12:28 PM

Head
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

wantingscott wrote:

well, if you look at the current stats, there are 17,061 ISM members currently... the "lovely hairy women" thread got 66 replies, many by the same people, though it has over 12,000 views...

i think "shaving cream" has become ISM's "bread and butter..."

wscvott

Where the hell did you get that stat?  We do not have 17 thou members!

Offline

#9 May 17th, 2005 12:34 PM

Head
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Belgareth wrote:

I have just been wandering through the current top 10, as voted for by the illustrious members of ISM, and I have noticed a trend which seems to buck the numerous statements, made in this forum, about the positive attributes (nay adoration even) of feminine body hair. Has anyone realised that, almost without exception, all of the contributors who have been voted into the current top 10 are displaying no body hair and, of those who are, there is very little of it.

Me thinks that, either the illustrious members are telling porkies, or they are just not voting.

I have been wondering a similar thing.  Mostly the fan mail we get, and the most enthusiastic comments, are directed at the real, natural, ordinary girls, the antithesis of the porn stereotype.  But the most subscriptions come through on days when the primary girl most resembles a penthouse pet.

Offline

#10 May 17th, 2005 02:08 PM

SCSIgirl
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Belgareth wrote:

I have just been wandering through the current top 10, as voted for by the illustrious members of ISM, and I have noticed a trend which seems to buck the numerous statements, made in this forum, about the positive attributes (nay adoration even) of feminine body hair. Has anyone realised that, almost without exception, all of the contributors who have been voted into the current top 10 are displaying no body hair and, of those who are, there is very little of it.

Me thinks that, either the illustrious members are telling porkies, or they are just not voting.

Not to be snide,  but maybe there really IS a 'silent majority'.  Only us loud vocal types are speaking up,  but the 'moral majority' makes the rules in a democracy.


"Apple of my Eye", "bated breath", "brave new world", "caught red-handed" - all coined by Shakespeare.

Offline

#11 May 17th, 2005 02:10 PM

SCSIgirl
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Gimme_Danger wrote:

I confessed in these fora that I personally like it all smooth and edible....and there have been some nice ones lately


As I've been saying,  it's way easier on your upper lip and you don't have to floss afterwards.


"Apple of my Eye", "bated breath", "brave new world", "caught red-handed" - all coined by Shakespeare.

Offline

#12 May 17th, 2005 03:57 PM

Gimme_Danger
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Head wrote:

I have been wondering a similar thing.  Mostly the fan mail we get, and the most enthusiastic comments, are directed at the real, natural, ordinary girls, the antithesis of the porn stereotype.  But the most subscriptions come through on days when the primary girl most resembles a penthouse pet.

I think there is a difference between personal care for the body and unnatural. I would consider trimming/shaving to be a preference or personal care like cutting head hair, shaving legs or cutting fingernails.

On the other end of the spectrum I would include plastic tits, lip liner, finger nail extensions and porn pout as being clichéd.

Offline

#13 May 17th, 2005 03:58 PM

Gimme_Danger
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

SCSIgirl wrote:

As I've been saying,  it's way easier on your upper lip and you don't have to floss afterwards.

worse than that is if you get one right at the back of the mouth or in the throat *shudder*

Offline

#14 May 17th, 2005 11:37 PM

wantingscott
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Head wrote:

Where the hell did you get that stat?  We do not have 17 thou members!


it's under forums/member control panel/forum home.

i do not mean to anger Head!!!


_________________________________________________
that's the way it goes. but don't forget, it goes the other way too.

Offline

#15 May 18th, 2005 03:01 AM

Belgareth
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

wantingscott wrote:

it's under forums/member control panel/forum home.

i do not mean to anger Head!!!

Have you got Admin rights to this forum engine WScott? That's a prohibited page! Or maybe your browser is looking at another forum ;-)


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#16 May 18th, 2005 03:08 AM

wantingscott
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

d'OH!!!
have i looked inadvertantly into the Temple of the Goddess????
Head, there was no treachery, please, gouge-out not my eyes!!!

wscott


_________________________________________________
that's the way it goes. but don't forget, it goes the other way too.

Offline

#17 May 18th, 2005 08:16 AM

Gimme_Danger
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

wantingscott wrote:

d'OH!!!
have i looked inadvertantly into the Temple of the Goddess????
Head, there was no treachery, please, gouge-out not my eyes!!!

wscott

I see the stat..I quote >> Threads: 322, Posts: 2,655, Members: 17,100
Welcome to our newest member, cepheus_98 <<

Offline

#18 May 18th, 2005 10:57 PM

Head
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Gimme_Danger wrote:

I see the stat..I quote >> Threads: 322, Posts: 2,655, Members: 17,100
Welcome to our newest member, cepheus_98 <<

Ok so the Forums have 17000 members.  Most of whom are asleep apparently!

Offline

#19 May 18th, 2005 11:25 PM

wantingscott
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

thank god!!!  i already spend too much time posting replies!!!


_________________________________________________
that's the way it goes. but don't forget, it goes the other way too.

Offline

#20 May 19th, 2005 03:08 AM

Manring
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Or occasionally napping, keeping one eye open on all that goes on here, leaving the sporadic note hither and yon. This forum (or fora, datum, data...all are commonly accepted now these days according to the best of English dictionaries) is one of the best things about ISM, off-topic as it may get at times. Most always entertaining and rather revealing about those who choose to post.

Manring

Head wrote:

Ok so the Forums have 17000 members.  Most of whom are asleep apparently!

Offline

#21 May 19th, 2005 03:19 AM

Belgareth
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Manring wrote:

Or occasionally napping, keeping one eye open on all that goes on here, leaving the sporadic note hither and yon. This forum (or fora, datum, data...all are commonly accepted now these days according to the best of English dictionaries) is one of the best things about ISM, off-topic as it may get at times. Most always entertaining and rather revealing about those who choose to post.

Manring

I've got to agree with that sentiment. Those members (including our lovely contributors) who are wake, rather than cat-napping or out for the count, definitely make this forum a higher priority than most other forms of entertainment and, unlike most other media, you can answer back ;-)


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#22 May 23rd, 2005 10:05 PM

dak
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

where can i find this top ten list?

Offline

#23 May 23rd, 2005 10:14 PM

Head
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

dak wrote:

where can i find this top ten list?

It's the ISM Hit List on the front of the site.

Offline

#24 May 24th, 2005 10:28 PM

jayhammer
Member

Re: Puzzling statistic

Thanks Head for putting  more hairy girls on the site recently, some completly hairy and some a little hairy, sugarsweet was both hairy and playboy material the big difference between all of the women on this site and magazines like playboy ect. is that all of the women on this site have natural breasts, and few here are completly shaven.  I love this site and I think I need to take a trip to Aus it appears the women there are very liberated. Thanks again for this site.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB