You are not logged in.
I'm not quite sure how you quantify intimacy but I broadly agree with the flow of their thinking.
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2 … -different
.
Last edited by blissed (February 14th, 2013 11:02 PM)
Offline
Hehe this other, more scientificy article linked at the bottom says that this first article is poppycock, but to be honest I read the first page and then zoned out, still with no idea whether men and women are different or not.
Well but the basic premise of the response article seems to be that 'different' or 'not different' is a stupid binary dichotomy just like 'man' and 'woman', and those studies aren't even extrapolated correctly, so you're not even using science right, nyaaahh!
Now I'm no scientist, but I reckon we are. Different, that is, both socially and fundamentally, with exceptions of course. Where there are categories there are distinctions - there's a reason these categories were defined. Now as we explore alternate spaces in what is, in fact, a gender spectrum, all we do is define new categories - which is effectively a way to <i>differentiate</i> oneself from the existing categories.
Offline
*Strikes up Ukulele and sings*
My own observations have sorted all this out without the need for science.
As peoples behaviour is moulded by social mores that demand almost complete compliance.
And trying to separate hardwired traits from the effects of environmental affairs
is certainly uncertain and can hardly be determined by a bunch of questionnaires
But with all this research I've reached a very definite conclusion
and that something has been very definitely proven
(Chorus)
We don't know more than we know
We don't know more than we know
If we're lost and in a muddle and think we've gone too far
We can't read our brain like a map, to find out where we are
Oh we don't know more than we know
My feeling is that there really isn't any kind difference we can see
that can't be explained by the brain being raised in a boy or girl's body
What's left is the difference, a born with difference, that everyone has placed upon us
Consciously unquantifiable but perceived with obvious undeniability by our conservative and presumptive subconscious
All this talk of differences is entertaining and only guesswork of sorts
Because of course, until we map the brain and relate it to how it controls our body and our thoughts
(Chorus)
We don't know more than we know
We don't know more than we know
If we're lost and in a muddle and think we've gone too far
We can't read our brain like a map, to find out where we are
Oh we don't know more than we know
(Guitar solo)
(Chorus)
We don't know more than we know
We don't know more than we know
If we're lost and in a muddle and think we've gone too far
We can't read our brain like a map, to find out where we are
Oh we don't know more than we know
.
Offline
Well I spent a very enjoyable couple of hours doing that, and as there's no replies it looks like I've conclusively sorted the issue ha ha your welcome
.
Offline
You wrote that, blissed?
Offline
Yeah, I love doing it. You can pretty much find out if someone wrote something by copying any paragraph or sentence and pasting it in it's entirety into google enclosed by "quotemarks" At the moment you get no results. But after a while it may give a result linking to the post like this http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&safe=off … 21&bih=982
I thought you were gonna reply with a rhymed post as well but once you start you can get sucked in and time you haven't got just flies.
.
Offline
My feeling is that there really isn't any kind difference we can see
that can't be explained by the brain being raised in a boy or girl's body
I found this post interesting
Previous studies have shown that women who take testosterone tend to see an improvement in their spatial navigation skills.
The video of his explanation is good too.
http://phys.org/news/2013-02-males-supe … onary.html
.
Offline
According to neuroscientists, women have better language skills. There is an article here:
Offline